Lecture 02 · IMO · CCMUN 2026 · ~16 min

Maritime Strategies & Delegate Preparation

From Analysis to Action

Protecting Vulnerable Coastal Communities Through Maritime Policy

Learning Objectives

Propose maritime adaptation strategies for coastal community protection
Compare bloc positions across East and West on climate displacement responses
Analyze the effectiveness of hard infrastructure versus nature-based solutions
Evaluate the role of international cooperation frameworks in addressing displacement
Formulate research strategies for effective delegate preparation
Develop debate arguments aligned with your country's position

Introduction · Why This Matters

From Problem to Policy

"How can IMO and the international community protect the most vulnerable coastal populations?" — Core Question, Lecture 02

In Lecture 01, we established the scale of climate-induced displacement: millions of people across Southeast Asia, Africa, the Pacific Islands, and the Americas face escalating threats from rising seas, intensifying storms, and coastal erosion. We mapped the IMO's mandate and explored why maritime governance is central to this crisis.

Now the question becomes urgent: How do we translate awareness into concrete action?

Three Pillars of This Lecture:

1. Maritime adaptation — the infrastructure and ecological strategies that protect coastlines
2. International cooperation — the political frameworks that mobilize resources and coordination
3. Effective representation — how you, as a delegate, translate your country's position into committee action

This lecture bridges the gap between understanding the problem and preparing to act on it. By the end, you will have the analytical tools to position your country, formulate arguments, and engage meaningfully in committee debate.

Adaptation · Infrastructure & Nature

From Seawalls to Mangroves

Maritime Adaptation

Maritime adaptation refers to the range of strategies — engineered and ecological — that societies deploy to protect coastal populations, infrastructure, and livelihoods from climate-related sea-level rise, storm surge, and coastal erosion. The choice of approach carries profound implications for cost, timeline, ecological health, and long-term resilience.

Hard Infrastructure

Engineered structures designed to physically block or redirect ocean forces.

Seawall providing coastal defence against erosion and storm surge. Hard engineering structures like this remain the most common adaptation in developed coastal zones, though they come with high costs and ecological trade-offs. (Credit: Stephen Middlemiss, CC BY-SA 2.0)

Seawalls, breakwaters, storm surge barriers
Thames Barrier (London) — 9 steel gates, protects 1.2M people
Delta Works (Netherlands) — one of the 7 modern engineering wonders
Tokyo floodwall — underground cathedral of flood control

Pros: Immediate protection; proven technology; scalable for urban coastlines

Cons: Extremely expensive (billions per project); ecological disruption; ongoing maintenance burden; may create false sense of security

Nature-Based Solutions

Ecological approaches that harness natural systems to absorb and buffer coastal threats.

Mangrove restoration — natural storm surge buffers, nursery habitats
Coral reef conservation — wave energy reduction by up to 97%
Dune rehabilitation — sand dune systems as natural barriers
Mekong Delta — largest mangrove restoration program globally
Great Green Wall (Africa) — 8,000 km ecological restoration corridor

Pros: Cost-effective; carbon sequestration; biodiversity co-benefits; community employment; self-maintaining

Cons: Time to establish (5–15 years); less effective for extreme events; climate-dependent (reefs bleach, mangroves need sediment)

Key Insight: The most effective adaptation strategies integrate both approaches — hybrid solutions that combine engineered defenses with restored natural systems. The challenge is not technical but financial and political: Who pays?

Bloc Analysis · East

EAST Bloc: Southeast Asia, Africa, Oceania

Sub-Bloc	Key Position	Core Argument
Southeast Asia	Urgent adaptation needed; limited funding	25 million people at risk; Jakarta sinking 25 cm/year; mangrove restoration is priority — but requires international financial support that has not materialized

Aerial view of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam — a low-lying Mekong Delta megacity acutely vulnerable to sea-level rise and monsoon flooding, home to over 9 million people. (Credit: Diego Delso, CC BY-SA 3.0)

Sub-Bloc	Key Position	Core Argument
Africa	Displacement + conflict nexus; infrastructure deficit	30 million+ affected; Lagos, Alexandria, Dar es Salaam critically exposed; need expanded Green Climate Fund access and debt relief to fund adaptation
Oceania (Pacific SIDS)	Existential threat; demand legal recognition	Tuvalu and Kiribati face total inundation; advocate for binding emissions targets and a new legal protocol recognizing climate displacement under international law

Funafuti Atoll, Tuvalu — the largest island of one of the world's most climate-vulnerable nations. Mean elevation: just 2 metres above sea level. Sea level here has risen approximately 15cm in 30 years. (Credit: NASA/USGS Earth Observatory, Public Domain)

Eastern Bloc Summary: For the East, climate displacement is not a future scenario — it is a present reality demanding immediate, funded action from the international community. These nations emphasize urgency, equity, and the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities.

Bloc Analysis · West

WEST Bloc: Americas & Europe

Sub-Bloc	Key Position	Core Argument
North America	Technical solutions focus; domestic political divide	United States: advanced adaptation technology but federal/state coordination challenges. Canada: Arctic displacement and developing immigration pathways for climate-displaced populations
Europe	Green Deal leadership; legal frameworks	EU: Integrated Coastal Zone Management directive, Marine Strategy Framework, leading Green Climate Fund contributor. Southern Europe (Mediterranean) faces increasing climate risks of its own

Horns Rev offshore wind park in the North Sea, Denmark — a flagship of the EU Green Deal. The European Union leads global climate policy through its comprehensive Green Deal framework and coastal management directives. (Credit: Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data 2024)

Sub-Bloc	Key Position	Core Argument
Central & South America	Climate-migration nexus; cross-border coordination	1.6 million new disaster displacements recorded (IDMC); vulnerable urban development along coasts; need regional cooperation frameworks and shared early-warning systems

Western Bloc Summary: For the West, the challenge is scaling adaptation finance while bridging domestic political divides on climate action. These nations emphasize technology transfer, institutional frameworks, and market-based mechanisms — but face criticism for insufficient financial commitments to the Global South.

Preparation · Research Questions

Preparing for Committee: Key Research Questions

Before entering the IMO committee, you must research your assigned country thoroughly. The following eight questions will guide your preparation and help you build a compelling, evidence-based position:

1. Is your country significantly exposed to climate-induced displacement?

Identify your country's coastline length, population density in coastal zones, and exposure index (e.g., ND-GAIN Country Index). A country with 70% of its population living below 10 meters elevation faces fundamentally different stakes than one with inland geography.

2. What specific threats do your coastal regions face?

Sea-level rise is not uniform. Some regions face storm surge amplification; others face saltwater intrusion into freshwater aquifers; still others face permanent inundation. Research which threat is primary for your country's coast.

3. Has your country implemented prevention or adaptation measures?

Document existing infrastructure — seawalls, mangrove programs, building codes, early-warning systems. Understanding what already exists is essential for proposing what comes next.

4. Is there a relocation plan for vulnerable coastal populations?

Some countries have begun managed retreat programs (e.g., Fiji's village relocation initiative, Indonesia's planned capital relocation). Others have no formal plan. Identify which category your country falls into.

5. What is the state of climate-resilient housing and infrastructure?

Examine building standards, zoning regulations, and insurance mechanisms for coastal properties. Many developing nations lack enforceable coastal construction codes.

6. How is funding allocated for coastal protection in your country?

Track domestic budgets, international aid flows, and private investment. Identify whether your country is a net recipient or contributor to adaptation finance.

7. How does your country balance economic development with ecosystem protection?

Many coastal nations face tension between port development, tourism infrastructure, and ecological conservation. Where does your country's policy land on this spectrum?

8. What cultural preservation policies exist for at-risk coastal communities?

Coastal communities often hold intangible cultural heritage — fishing traditions, oral histories, sacred sites. Research whether your country has policies protecting these assets during relocation or adaptation.

Debate · Guided Points

Guided Debate: Points You Must Address

When you enter committee, these five contested questions will shape the discourse. Your ability to articulate a clear position on each will determine your influence in negotiations.

1. Defining Climate Displacement

Should IMO take a position, or does it fall under UNFCCC/UNHCR?

The IMO's mandate centers on maritime safety, security, and environmental protection. Climate displacement intersects with multiple UN bodies. As a delegate, you must argue whether IMO should claim jurisdiction over maritime climate displacement or defer to existing frameworks. Your answer shapes the committee's entire approach.

2. Infrastructure vs. Nature

Which approach should receive priority funding through IMO?

Hard infrastructure offers immediate protection but costs billions. Nature-based solutions are cheaper and generate co-benefits but take years to mature. As a delegate, you must argue for a funding priority — or propose a hybrid model that satisfies both camps.

3. Cultural Heritage

Should IMO mandate cultural impact assessments for coastal projects?

Relocation and adaptation projects often destroy the cultural fabric of coastal communities. Should IMO require cultural impact assessments alongside environmental ones? This question tests whether the committee values human heritage alongside engineering solutions.

4. Legal Framework

Should a new protocol be created under IMO for climate-displaced maritime communities?

Some delegations — particularly Pacific SIDS — advocate for a binding legal instrument recognizing climate-displaced persons as a protected category under international maritime law. Others argue this overextends IMO's mandate. This is the most consequential structural question in the committee.

5. North-South Cooperation

How do we structure technology transfer and funding mechanisms?

Eastern blocs demand unconditional grants and debt relief. Western blocs prefer conditional financing and technology licensing. As a delegate, you must propose a mechanism that bridges this divide — or align with one side and defend your choice.

Reflection · Final Thoughts

Final Thoughts: Becoming an Effective Delegate

Effective representation in the IMO committee requires more than knowledge. It demands strategic thinking, negotiation skill, and the ability to translate your country's position into actionable proposals.

Four Pillars of Effective Representation

Knowledge of your country's specific vulnerabilities — not generic climate facts, but the precise coastal threats, population exposure, and existing adaptation capacity of your assigned nation.
Understanding of IMO mandate boundaries — knowing what the committee can and cannot do, and how to work within those limits to achieve real outcomes.
Ability to propose concrete, actionable solutions — not just identifying problems, but drafting resolutions, suggesting funding mechanisms, and offering technical expertise.
Willingness to cooperate across blocs — the most effective delegates build coalitions. Find common ground with opponents and negotiate from a position of mutual interest.

Reflection Questions

[Comprehension] What are the two categories of maritime adaptation, and what are their trade-offs?
[Analysis] Why do Eastern and Western blocs approach climate displacement differently?
[Evaluation] Which bloc's position is most aligned with IMO's mandate, and why?
[Application] Draft a one-minute opening statement for your country on maritime adaptation.

Extension Reading

IMO (2024). Strategic Plan for the Organization for the Period 2024–2029
UNFCCC. Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage
IPCC (2023). AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023

— End of Lecture 02 —
Thank you for completing the CCMUN 2026 IMO Delegate Training. Good luck in committee!

← Back to Course Home